Whose problem

Some recent trends have convinced me that wherever the burden of health care may fall, we would be better served if employers were not the best place to get it.

The first trend is toward corporate streamlining. My company has been doing this pell-mell for the last four years, partially to catch up and consolidate with the larger company that had just purchased it when this trend had begun and partially because the larger company has itself continued to slim down. To slim down, the company has outsourced several business functions (AP, Payroll/HR and IT are the most prominent.) This saves the company money, but in order for the vendors who now perform these services to maintain their margins, they have to hire people who are utterly incompetent. So when I transferred to a new location this past summer and had to choose a new health plan, somehow my choice was not correctly executed. Frustratingly, when I pointed this out to my HR department, they told me there was nothing they could do. (Seriously, what do we pay you for?) I had to call an 800 number. And wait on hold. And eventually, even though I spoke to someone, when they made the change, they made it to a different but still incorrect choice.

The end result of this was that for about a two week period, although I think I was technically covered by health insurance, I didn’t have insurance cards for myself or my wife, nor did I really have access to, say, print them out. That was a little uncomfortable. (This story is nothing compared to the Payroll nightmare. That group has had a hell of time just getting me paid the correct amount–they’ve screwed up four different times–but not only that, they’ve overstated my income on my W-2 by nearly over 10,000 dollars and despite the fact that I pointed this out nearly two months ago, still haven’t corrected it.)

The bottom line is that it sucks that my company has found such incompetent people and that we as employees must suffer. (To say nothing about our small vendors who depend on our timely payment not only to feed their families but the families of everyone that works for them.) But it’s even worse that our health care could be subject to the capricious errors of an incompetent contractor.

But now that they’ve outsourced and outsourced and there isn’t anything left to give to incompetent contractors, my company is struggling to find new ways to keep margins high. And one thing they’ve noticed, that lots of companies have noticed, is that health care costs are really high. This is a tough problem–a good opportunity. What my company (and others) have decided is that they now have a vested interest in the health of their employees. To what extent this is true is debatable…as we discussed two years ago, rising health care costs are going…somewhere. But is it really to help unhealthy people?

Not that it matters. My company has gone gung-ho into a program called “Health Works.” (Guess what? This program is outsourced, to a company called WellCorp.) First off, they are enticing (not coercing, yet,) employees to fill out an involved medical questionnaire. After that, it gets creepy. From the slickly-produced pamphlet mailed to my house (which features an abundance of beautiful, healthy people):

Why are strangers calling me at home and asking me about my health status? How did they get my health information?

The health professionals who are calling will give you the opportunity to enroll in a lifestyle management program to help you make lifestyle changes or manage chronic conditions. The health information was provided to the callers by our health care administrators. [Our company] has no knowledge of your personal health information and will not receive any information resulting from these calls.

Ok. This, to me, is over the top. This is beyond soft paternalism. I appreciate companies giving us benefits and offering programs to make us healthier. But lifestyle choices are choices. If health care costs hurt employer’s bottom lines to the point where they feel the need to pressure employees into a pre-selected routine then it’s time for the health care dollars to come from somewhere else. And that somewhere else may be totally elective, totally government-paid (i.e., “universal” health care,) or somewhere in the middle. But although I’d favor a system perhaps more on the universal side, I think it’s important that any financial disincentive toward an “unhealthy” lifestyle be born in such a way that the choice is preserved.

I enjoyed the story in Business Week on this subject which takes a balanced look at some of the tough choices facing large companies in the realm of health care costs.

2 Comments

Who needs the Super Bowl?

I found this set of competing advertisements from an image blog hilarious. I included the link to the whole page, which I encourage you to check out. To highlight my favorites, though, I included them here. I recommend taking them one at a time. Read the rest of this entry »

Comments

Now with 20% more blur!

I was reading David Pogue’s weekly e-mail column on technology and came across an interesting quote from a techie responding to one of Pogue’s earlier columns on the meaning of megapixels in digital cameras (and specifically, in this case, on the small sensors that must be used in camera phones due to space constraints but which can’t provide very good image quality)

“Engineers are well aware of the problems, and they keep butting heads with the marketing people. Guess who has the real power?”

I can’t say whether I’m happy or not that this seems to be a universal problem with “marketing people.” Perhaps something about the American organization years ago led people to believe that they should push as hard as they can to make their particular business function’s numbers the best possible. And though that ideology has changed into one in which most people take a broader view, one of “what’s good for the organization,” one which says some give and take may be necessary, sales and marketing still push for that one additional sale no matter what the cost.

Ahh well. It’s not as if engineers or anyone else have a magic solution, either.

Comments

Don’t whistle while you walk

I have been fuming for a couple of days (with a number of other people) over the proposed limits to using handheld electronics.

NY State Sen. Carl Krueger has called for a ban of cell phones and music players while crossing streets after a two cases in which pedestrians died while using such devices. We all knew that our US Congressmen were out of touch but apparently in NY it’s true at the state level as well.

Says Krueger,

“You can’t be fully aware of your surroundings if you’re fiddling with a BlackBerry, dialing a phone number, playing Super Mario Brothers on a Game Boy, or listening to music on an iPod.”

Really? You mean it’s ok if someone listens to music in their car but not while they’re walking?

But it would hardly surprise me if such a bill passes. After all, New York City is the center of gravity for the state. And those sophisticated Manhattanites have no problem telling other people what to do. This is the center of the movement to ban smoking from restaurants, the city that banned trans-fats. They want to eliminate death of any source and they’re just smart enough to know how to do it.

Readers of this site know that I’m no great fan of the Republican party. But I’m beginning to believe that the ideas coming from the wealthy urban Democrats of the Northeast are even more antithetical to my own. But perhaps swiping at the iPod crowd will hurt these unliberal Democrats. Just remember, New York is the home of Clinton and Giuliani.

But back to the immediate matter.  Perhaps Mr Krueger has never had the experience. But I’m sure most of us can remember a time or two when walked or biked or drove without much attention to our surroundings, not because of a cell phone conversation, a video game in our hand or music in our ears, but because of being lost in our own thoughts. Perhaps the best answer, then, is to regulate thinking, too?

1 Comment

DRM a drag

Even Steve Jobs says so, if we’re to believe him. This has already generated a flurry of response so I won’t waste too much breath. Just one opinion can be read here and most of what I’ve seen is in this vain.

Anyone else get a grin out of Jobs blaming the music industry? Those who know me have probably heard me blame the instrustry for their CD sales woes ad naseum. Anyone else just learn that Sony had a proprietary music player out there?

Comments